To request a blog written on a specific topic, please email James@StatisticsSolutions.com with your suggestion. Thank you!

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Qualitative Data




Thematizing and three coding types (open, axial, and selective)


  • Thematizing refers to the analysis of interview responses.

  • To analyze the interview responses, data is analyzed for the presence of themes.  Interview responses can be examined multiple times on an overall basis OR  on responses per interview question to identify the themes.

  • Typically, if agreement, or a repeated comment(s), is found among three responses or more, it is considered a theme. 

  • Three types of coding are open, axial, and selective.

  • Open coding refers to revealing X set of themes and what those themes are related to and/or can be considered by.  Open coding responses can be presented in a table by theme, by the phrases/descriptive words that help illustrate the theme, and by the participant id that the phrases/descriptive words come from.

    • For example: An interview was conducted on 12 middle school teachers, regarding new school grading policies.  Open coding revealed two sets of themes, negative reaction and uncertainty, that related to interview question 4 “How are your students reacting towards the implementation of the new grading policies?  Three participants felt that the implementation of the new school grading policies causes a negative reaction from students, such as tantrums and violence, and five participants felt that the implementation of the new school grading policies causes uncertainty, such as crying and screaming.  See the table below for details.


Interview Question 4 Open Coding Responses
Participant
Theme
Phrases/descriptive words




Negative reaction

3

He [the student] started hitting his desk and threatening to just walk out of the classroom.
4

They [the students] just started yelling at me and telling me that I better not or else.
12

Papers and pencils were thrown everywhere.

Uncertainty

1

I saw the look on their faces…as if I was punishing them and they didn’t understand why.
4

One student was quiet at first, then started to sob uncontrollably. 
7

…just kept asking me why over and over again.
11

Received a call from a parent telling me that their child couldn’t describe how school was that day. 
12

I had to repeat the instruction multiple times throughout the day.  The kids just didn’t get it.  One kid began screaming, which got a few others at it too.


  • Axial coding refers to revealing the thematic relationships in order from strongest to weak associations, and also presenting examples.

    • For example: (using the same example stated previously)  Axial coding for responses on interview question 4 revealed the following thematic relationship in order from strongest to weak associations:

1.      Five of the 12 participants (42%) specified lack of comprehension and confused reactions (e.g., just didn’t get it, couldn’t describe how school was, kept asking me why, didn’t understand why, quiet at first then started to sob).
2.      Three of the 12 participants (25%) specified threats and physical reactions (e.g., tell me I better not, started hitting, papers and pencils thrown).

  •  Selective coding refers to the topic of the research question and an excerpt from a participant that best mentions/illustrates the themes mentioned. 

    • For example: (using the same example stated previously) Selective coding of interview question 4, student reaction toward policy implementation, generated two themes: negative reaction and uncertainty.  The researcher selected one participant’s statement that reflected the axial coding with the most congruence.  Participant 4 stated, “I really thought it wouldn’t be too difficult.  I feel like my students are fast learners, but I was wrong.  I guess they are just too young to understand why and what was happening.  On the first week, I had several mishaps.  One student was quiet at first, then started to sob uncontrollably.  My kids weren’t taking it too well.  They just started yelling at me and telling me that I better not or else.  After a couple more days, I just didn’t know what to do.”

Monday, February 11, 2013

Types of Qualitative research designs




Grounded theory, ethnographic, narrative research, historical, case studies, and phenomenology are several types of qualitative research designs.  The proceeding paragraphs give a brief over view several of these qualitative methods.  

Grounded theory is a systematic procedure of data analysis, typically associated with qualitative research, that allows researchers to develop a theory that explains a specific phenomenon.  Grounded theory was developed by Glaser and Strauss and is used to conceptualize phenomenon using research; grounded theory is not seen as a descriptive method and originates from sociology.  The unit of analysis in grounded theory is a specific phenomenon or incident, not individual behaviors.   The primary data collection method is through interviews of approximately 20 - 30 participants or until data achieves saturation.  

Ethnographic studies are qualitative procedures utilized to describe, analyze and interpret a culture’s characteristics.  Ethnography was developed in the 19th and 20th centuries and used by anthropologists to explore primitive cultures different from their own; it originated from Anthropology.  Ethnography is used when a researcher wants to study a group of people to gain a larger understanding of their lives or specific aspects of their lives.  The primary data collection method is through observation over an extended period of time.  It would also be appropriate to interview others who have studied the same cultures.

Phenomenology is used to identify phenomena and focus on subjective experiences and understanding the structure of those lived experiences.  It was founded in the early 20th century by Edmund Husserl and Martin Heideggar and originated from philosophy.  Phenomenology is used to describe, in depth, the common characteristics of the phenomena that has occurred.   The primary data collection method is through in-depth interviews.  

Case studies are believed to have originated in 1829 by Frederic Le Play.  Case studies are rooted in several disciplines, including science, education, medicine, and law.  Case studies are to be used when (1) the researcher wants to focus on how and why, (2) the behavior is to be observed, not manipulated, (3) to further understand a given phenomenon, and (4) if the boundaries between the context and phenomena are not clear.  Multiple methods can be used to gather data, including interviews, observation, and historical documentation.